Georgia VASP registration & operations See our delivery model
Mon–Fri · 09:00–18:00
VASP IMPLEMENTATION SERVICE

Managed VASP Compliance and Change Control

VASP legal, compliance and technology team working through an implementation plan

Managed VASP Compliance and Change Control

Protect the operating value of registration through controlled updates, evidence, reporting and supervisory readiness.

The company needs an owner for regulatory changes, recurring controls, monitoring quality, management information, training, reporting, incidents and material changes to owners, administrators, services, channels, providers and systems.

For Registered VASPs and scale-up management

Service overview

Post-registration compliance is evidenced through recurring controls, management decisions, change records, testing and timely remediation.

  • Regulatory change register
  • Reporting calendar and board reports
  • Customer-file and alert QA
  • Risk and policy refreshes
  • Capital adequacy and resilience calendar
Project team reviewing Georgian VASP implementation evidence
Compliance and technology specialists reviewing operational controls

Operate the controls you presented

Registration begins supervision. Product changes, new corridors, staffing changes, incidents, provider changes and control weaknesses require documented assessment and, where applicable, regulatory action.

Management value

A live compliance calendar, useful management information, tested files and a controlled record of material changes.

Operate a live control calendar

Recurring obligations, capital adequacy, independent assurance, penetration testing, vulnerability scans, regulatory change, file and alert QA, training, incidents, product changes and board information are assigned to named owners with evidence and escalation.

OPERATOR'S NOTE

A common failure

Compliance becomes a list of dates while customer-risk, monitoring backlog, overrides, provider failures and remediation quality remain invisible to management.

What you can expect from us

We begin with the live model and current evidence, agree the decisions and dependencies, then issue a written scope. You may engage us for advice and review only, for a defined implementation module, or for the complete build and regulatory coordination. The quotation caps our professional fee for the agreed assumptions and separates the GEL 5,000 official registration fee, translations, personnel, office, software, assurance and other third-party costs.

Founder decision

Agree the product perimeter, markets, counterparties and risk appetite before costly build work.

Operating evidence

Connect each claim to an accountable person, configured control, record and test result.

Launch consequence

Carry approved assumptions into filing, banking, provider onboarding and supervised operations.

Virtual-asset compliance, monitoring and reporting system architecture
Registration does not cap enforcement risk. The current sanctions framework includes GEL 20,000 penalties for operating outside the NBG-agreed service scheme, GEL 10,000 for obstructing an inspection, GEL 7,000 for each missing inspection item and GEL 5,000 for each unfulfilled written instruction. Other fines apply per customer, transaction, report or breach, and repeated violations may double the amount. See supervision and enforcement.

Questions we address in this workstream

Ownership, administrators, services, customer markets, branches or kiosks, websites or applications, custody, providers, systems, material AML risks and operating capacity can affect the approved model. The change register should determine required approval, notification, testing and evidence before release.

The agreed scope may cover regulatory change, reporting calendars, file and alert quality assurance, risk and policy refreshes, management packs, training, material-change assessments, inspection preparation and remediation coordination. The VASP still owns decisions and obligations.

Management information should reveal customer and geographic risk, alert volume and ageing, unusual-activity decisions, sanctions events, reconciliation breaks, provider incidents, complaints, access exceptions, staff capacity, regulatory deadlines and the status of corrective action.

Keep a current evidence index, sample files and alerts, test record retrieval, rehearse system journeys and interview control owners. Findings should have root cause, owner, due date, action, retest and closure evidence rather than last-minute document production.

No. External specialists may perform defined tasks, but the company and its administrators must understand the risk, approve material decisions, oversee performance, access evidence and act on issues. Contracts should make roles and escalation transparent.

LEGAL BASIS

Applicable legislation and regulatory materials

CryptoLicense.ge Legal & Regulatory Team Legal review: 1 September 2026 Model-specific legal review required

Build for registration. Operate for supervision.