Projects do not need to buy the same bundle. We scope support around the starting point, intended model, existing systems and people, and the evidence still required.
Regulatory Blueprint
A defined feasibility and design engagement covering service classification, ownership, markets, customers, product flows, sanctions exposure, regulatory overlaps, dependencies and an implementation roadmap.
This is normally the right starting point when founders are still selecting the jurisdiction, custody model, fiat rails or target countries. It can conclude that the model is viable, needs redesign or should stop before major expenditure.
Registration Build
For teams with credible systems and personnel: Georgian company, governance, application evidence, business plan coordination, translations, filing and NBG response management.
The client retains day-to-day ownership of technology, policy implementation and recruitment. We control the evidence matrix, dossier consistency, Georgian-language process and regulatory engagement around the agreed inputs.
Operational Launch
A milestone-based implementation programme spanning law, compliance, substance, staff, technology, providers, testing, system demonstration and go-live.
This route is designed for founders who want one accountable programme connecting multiple specialists. Stage gates are tied to evidence readiness, not a marketing deadline.
Managed VASP
Continuing regulatory change, monitoring/file QA, reporting calendar, training, audit coordination, product change control and inspection response.
How to choose
| Starting position | Typical route |
|---|---|
| Concept or uncertain perimeter | Regulatory Blueprint |
| Operating group with reusable systems and people | Blueprint followed by Registration Build |
| Founder team requiring local operation from zero | Operational Launch |
| Registered provider adding products or strengthening controls | Managed VASP or a defined change project |
What the quotation contains
After a confidential assessment we issue a written scope, capped professional fee, milestones, acceptance criteria, assumptions, exclusions, client responsibilities and third-party dependencies. The scope can be expanded only through an agreed change.
Start with the smallest decision that removes the largest risk
A founder who is uncertain about scope should not purchase the complete build immediately. A registered operator with a defined control weakness should not buy a new-company package. The assessment identifies the shortest responsible route and the evidence needed to close it.